<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cactus Thinking &#187; architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cactus.org.cn/tag/architecture/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cactus.org.cn</link>
	<description>程序是改出来的。</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:26:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>【架构反模式】-如果你的架构满足以下条件，那么它一开始就是一个欠佳的架构(Your architecture starts to be suboptimal if&#8230;)</title>
		<link>http://www.cactus.org.cn/2008/12/%e3%80%90%e6%9e%b6%e6%9e%84%e5%8f%8d%e6%a8%a1%e5%bc%8f%e3%80%91-%e5%a6%82%e6%9e%9c%e4%bd%a0%e7%9a%84%e6%9e%b6%e6%9e%84%e6%bb%a1%e8%b6%b3%e4%bb%a5%e4%b8%8b%e6%9d%a1%e4%bb%b6%ef%bc%8c%e9%82%a3%e4%b9%88.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.cactus.org.cn/2008/12/%e3%80%90%e6%9e%b6%e6%9e%84%e5%8f%8d%e6%a8%a1%e5%bc%8f%e3%80%91-%e5%a6%82%e6%9e%9c%e4%bd%a0%e7%9a%84%e6%9e%b6%e6%9e%84%e6%bb%a1%e8%b6%b3%e4%bb%a5%e4%b8%8b%e6%9d%a1%e4%bb%b6%ef%bc%8c%e9%82%a3%e4%b9%88.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Translations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dating07.com/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[translate from  Adam Bien by 丑鑫鑫
1. 很多专家参与，但是没有一个人是真正投入其中的。There are lot of experts involved, but no one is really excited.
 2. 一天天的谈论没有被论证或代码讨论的概念和架构。You are talking for more than a day about concepts and architectures without a single Proof Of Concept or even discussion of code.
 3. 一味地推销特性，而对将会造成的后果（风险）避而不谈。You are just selling the features without explaining the consequences.
 4. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cactus.org.cn/2008/12/%e3%80%90%e6%9e%b6%e6%9e%84%e5%8f%8d%e6%a8%a1%e5%bc%8f%e3%80%91-%e5%a6%82%e6%9e%9c%e4%bd%a0%e7%9a%84%e6%9e%b6%e6%9e%84%e6%bb%a1%e8%b6%b3%e4%bb%a5%e4%b8%8b%e6%9d%a1%e4%bb%b6%ef%bc%8c%e9%82%a3%e4%b9%88.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
